Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41406382›Full record

ReviewJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Essential Requirements and Relevant Technologies for Load-Bearing 3D-Printed Transtibial Prosthetic Sockets and Their Components: State-of-the-Art Review.

Erika Dagge, Breda Clancy, Gavin Keane, Brian Casey, Declan Devine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erika DaggeDepartment of Mechnical and Polymer Engineering, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, Co. Westmeath, N37 HD68, Ireland, 090 6468291.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-1987
Breda ClancyAtlantic Prosthetic Orthotic Services Ltd, Galway, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6791-7323
Gavin KeaneDepartment of Mechnical and Polymer Engineering, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, Co. Westmeath, N37 HD68, Ireland, 090 6468291.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2667-202X
Brian CaseyDepartment of Humanities, South East Technological University, Carlow, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-5171
Declan DevineDepartment of Mechnical and Polymer Engineering, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest, University Road, Athlone, Co. Westmeath, N37 HD68, Ireland, 090 6468291.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1364-5583

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The manufacture of load-bearing prosthetic lower limb sockets is traditionally reliant on skilled technicians working with qualified clinicians to create bespoke solutions. While this approach is effective and, in some situations, necessary, the appeal of a sustainable, efficient, and digitalized production solution cannot be ignored. The focus of additive manufacturing (AM) is typically on low-weight-bearing prostheses, which can be misleading for clinics attempting to adopt AM solutions for clientele with weight-bearing or activity-level needs. Objective: This review aims to offer readers a way to approach AM for load-bearing requirements as opposed to non-load-bearing counterparts. The use cases of AM for the production of load-bearing transtibial prosthetic sockets and components are reviewed to highlight current trends, protocols, and standings. Methods: By reviewing publications from the past 25 years, this state-of-the-art review highlights the key requirements and technologies relevant for load-bearing transtibial prosthetic sockets specifically. Results: The most commonly used AM solutions for commercial use, such as selective laser sintering and binder jetting through Multi Jet Fusion, are outlined. As these solutions are most often paired with the structural testing standard International Organization for Standardization 10328, their relevance for evaluating the strength and durability of lower limb sockets is also discussed. Clinician and technician experiences of digitalized ways of working within the prosthetic industry for load-bearing applications are outlined. Conclusions: Observations of adoption barriers of AM solutions are brought to light, focusing on clinician and technician education, skill set, exposure to innovative technologies, and trust in the regulation of digital processes in a clinical and technical environment.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingdigitalizationload-bearingprosthesisprosthetic sockettranstibial

Identifiers

PMID41406382
PMCPMC12710985

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.