ArticleScientific reports2025
Repellent and insecticidal activities of Pinus halepensis and Cupressus sempervirens extracts against the West Nile virus vector Culex pipiens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mosquitoes are major disease vectors that pose serious public health threats. Extensive use of synthetic insecticides against mosquitoes has caused resistance, environmental pollution, and health risks, making it imperative to use natural alternatives. This study evaluated the larvicidal and repellent activities of Pinus halepensis and Cupressus sempervirens leaf extracts and essential oils against Culex pipiens, the vector of West Nile virus, and profiled their phytochemical composition. Methanol, acetone, ethyl acetate, and n-hexane extracts, along with EOs, were tested for larvicidal toxicity and analyzed by UPLC/MS and GC/MS. EOs exhibited the highest larvicidal potency, with LC₅₀ values of 71.96 ppm for P. halepensis and 96.38 ppm for C. sempervirens, followed by solvent extracts in the order acetone > n-hexane > methanol > ethyl acetate. Both oils provided complete repellency (100%) for 150 min at 1% concentration. UPLC/MS identified 58 secondary metabolites, mainly flavonoids and diterpenoids, while GC/MS revealed 20 components from monoterpenes, sesqui-, di-, and triterpenes side by side with fatty acids. Biochemical assays showed that P. halepensis extract caused greater inhibition of acetylcholinesterase, esterases, and antioxidant enzymes (SOD, GST, CAT, and GSH), with elevated oxidative stress markers (LPO and TPC) compared to C. sempervirens. These findings demonstrate the potential of P. halepensis and C. sempervirens extracts, particularly EOs, as eco-friendly botanical larvicides and repellents against Cx. pipiens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.