Evidence mapPaperPMID 41408495Full record

Trial reportJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2025

A Qualitative Exploration of Facilitators and Barriers to Early Time-Restricted Eating: Insights From a Randomised Controlled Trial.

Nenette A Cáceres, Felicia L Steger, Sarah-Jeanne Salvy, Humaira Jamshed, Amy H Warriner, Corby K Martin, Courtney M Peterson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Elucidation of daily timed-palatable meal-anticipatory activity in the circadian system of mice.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nenette A CáceresDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8039-2598
Felicia L StegerDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-4082
Sarah-Jeanne SalvyDepartment of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Humaira JamshedDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Amy H WarrinerDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Corby K MartinIngestive Behavior Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.
Courtney M PetersonDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

Why is the prevalence of obesity so high in U.S. Southern States? Regional predictors of BMI and obesity treatment response.P30DK056336 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI James O Hill · 2000 to 2026
$31.9M
Time-Restricted Eating and Cancer: Clinical Outcomes, Mechanisms, and ModeratorsR01CA258222 · NCI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI FIGUEIREDO, JANE C., PETERSON, COURTNEY MARIE · 2021 to 2025
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA258222NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to time-restricted eating (TRE), a form of intermittent fasting, is typically high. However, the social, psychological, and environmental factors influencing adherence are unknown. Herein, we examined factors affecting participants' adherence to early TRE (eTRE) relative to a control schedule and whether they intended to continue practicing TRE after the intervention.

methodsNinety adults with obesity were enroled in a weight management programme and randomised to either an eTRE (8-h eating window from 07:00 to 15:00) or a control schedule (≥ 12-h eating window) for 14 weeks. Seventy-one participants (eTRE: n = 34, Control: n = 37) completed exit interviews exploring facilitators and barriers to adherence. Data were evaluated using thematic analysis.

resultsPerceived health benefits, meal planning, reminders, and accountability promoted adherence to the prescribed meal timing interventions. Social relationships, break days, and unstructured or variable routines, particularly on weekends, served as facilitators or barriers, depending on the participant. Disruptions in family and social life were barriers. Most eTRE participants intended to continue practicing TRE after the study concluded, with modifications to better suit their individual circumstances.

conclusionsPlanning meals in advance, setting reminders for when to eat, focusing on health benefits, and accountability help people adhere to eTRE. Strategies to promote adherence should be personalised and address irregular routines, as well as potential challenges to family and social life. Allowing some flexibility in meal timing schedules may also promote long-term sustainability.

Indexed as

FastingFeeding BehaviorObesityPatient ComplianceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMealsMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTime FactorsWeight Reduction Programsbehavioural facilitators and barrierscircadian nutritionearly time‐restricted eatingobesity and weight managementqualitative thematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41408495
PMCPMC13015813

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.