Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409372›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Exploring the Impact of Foods and Dietary Patterns on Melanoma Risk.

Matus Kalavsky, Shafiah Muna Abdul Gafoor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matus KalavskyDermatology, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, GBR.
Shafiah Muna Abdul GafoorDermatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the US. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation remains the primary environmental risk factor for melanoma; however, there is growing interest in exploring additional preventive strategies, particularly through diet. This narrative review aims to consolidate current evidence on the relationship between dietary patterns and melanoma risk, providing insights that may guide clinicians in offering dietary recommendations to their patients. Mediterranean and DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension) diets have been linked with potentially protective effects against melanoma. Similarly, the consumption of anti-inflammatory foods (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, herbs, spices, and other plant-based proteins) and regular coffee intake have shown associations with lower melanoma risk in observational studies. By contrast, alcohol consumption, adherence to a Western diet, and possibly high citrus fruit intake are linked to an increased risk of developing melanoma. While red and processed meats may be associated with a lower melanoma risk, their potential benefits are overshadowed by their associated risks for other cancers. The relationship between fish intake and melanoma risk appears to be complex, with some studies suggesting that canned tuna may be associated with an increased melanoma risk, whereas fried fish is linked to a potentially protective effect. Evidence remains inconclusive on the link between melanoma risk and nutrients such as selenium and vitamins A-E, as well as polyunsaturated fats and tea.

Indexed as

diet and dermatologymalignant melanomaprimary prevention of skin cancer­skin cancerskin cancer prevention

Identifiers

PMID41409372
PMCPMC12708011

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.