Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409383›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2025

A Taguchi Design of Experiments Approach for Untargeted Metabolomics Sample Preparation Optimization.

Brianna M Garcia, Goncalo J Gouveia, Amanda O Shaver, Ricardo M Borges, I Jonathan Amster, Arthur S Edison, Franklin E Leach Iii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brianna M GarciaUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.
Goncalo J GouveiaUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.
Amanda O ShaverUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.
Ricardo M BorgesUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.
I Jonathan AmsterUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.
Arthur S EdisonUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.
Franklin E Leach IiiUniversity of Georgia AthensGA30602 United States.

Funding

Portal for Open Computational Metabolomics Tools - Yr 4 U2C SupplementU2CES030167 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI EDISON, ARTHUR S · 2018 to 2021
$4.2M
Platform for in vivo Metabolism - Equipment SupplementR35GM148240 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ARTHUR S EDISON · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030167NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of metabolomics leverages advanced analytical techniques, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), to identify and quantify metabolites that are integral to biology. The scope of untargeted metabolomics methods is highly dependent on the protocols employed prior to analysis. These include homogenization and extraction processes, which directly influence the metabolites detected and, consequently, the biological interpretations drawn. Given the substantial variability introduced by different homogenization and extraction parameters, the optimization of these protocols for non-routine or novel sample matrices is essential, particularly in core facilities where a diverse range of matrices are expected to be analyzed. In response to this need, we demonstrate the utility of a Taguchi design of experiments (DOE) method for the systematic optimization of matrix-specific sample preparation parameters using the model organism

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansChromatography, LiquidMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMass SpectrometryMetabolomeResearch DesignSolventsSolvents

Identifiers

PMID41409383
PMCPMC12707492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.