ArticleTherapeutic advances in drug safety2025
Evaluating seizures associated with novel antineoplastic agents during breast cancer treatment using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and Canada Vigilance Adverse Reaction Online Database.
Article in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Metabolic phenotypes of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity among patients with breast cancer.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2026Article
- Characterizing bleeding adverse events associated with BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors: insights from FAERS reports.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Adverse events of capecitabine in gastric cancer patients: a real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a rising incidence of neurological adverse events (AEs), such as seizures, associated with novel anticancer agents, warranting investigation. Large-scale studies assessing seizure risk across diverse anticancer drug classes, particularly in breast cancer (BC), remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the association between seizures and 14 novel anticancer agents used in BC treatment, compared with traditional chemotherapy, utilizing international pharmacovigilance databases. Design: A large-scale, real-world pharmacovigilance study using data from the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Canada Vigilance Database (from Q1 2004 to Q1 2025). Methods: Disproportionality analysis was employed to calculate reporting odds ratios (RORs) for identifying significant seizure AE signals. Signals were assessed at both the Standardised MedDRA Query and Preferred Term levels. Pan-cancer transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas were integrated to explore biological pathways correlated with drug-induced seizures. Results: Significant and consistent seizure signals were identified for five agents-Lapatinib, Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1), and Atezolizumab-across both databases. In FAERS, over 50% of seizures occurred after 100 days of treatment (median: 68 days); however, fatal cases exhibited a significantly shorter median onset time. Novel agents demonstrated disproportionately higher seizure reporting signals compared to traditional chemotherapy. Pan-cancer analysis revealed negative correlations between seizure RORs and pathways, including asthma and the pentose phosphate pathway. Conclusion: This dual-database pharmacovigilance study identifies potential associations between seizures and five novel BC therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring during their clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.