ReviewFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2025
Bridging the digital divide: student-led literacy initiatives in diabetes management.
Review in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of digital health technologies-such as continuous glucose monitors, automated insulin delivery systems, and telehealth platforms-has transformed diabetes management. However, a persistent digital divide continues to amplify health disparities based on socioeconomic status, geography, and age. Generational gaps are especially notable. "Digital immigrants" (older adults) often face significant barriers to technology adoption, such as reduced digital literacy, lower smartphone ownership, and difficulties using remote care platforms. Individuals aged 80 and above have much lower uptake of continuous glucose monitors and telemedicine, even when cost is not a barrier. Health literacy and language challenges further increase the impact and reduce the use of digital health tools among older adults. In contrast, "digital natives"-younger generations with strong technological skills-are well positioned to help bridge this divide. This mini-review summarizes current evidence on disparities in digital diabetes care and proposes an innovative, student-led solution. We advocate for empowering digital native health sciences students to lead digital health literacy initiatives and serve as technology mentors for both patients and clinicians. By establishing student-led digital literacy centers, academic institutions can promote intergenerational collaboration. This approach can turn the generational divide from a barrier into an opportunity. Ultimately, student-led initiatives offer a sustainable, community-based pathway to equitable adoption of digital diabetes technologies and improved health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.