ReviewJournal of inflammation research2025
Established and Emerging Biological Therapies for the Treatment of Comorbid Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Review in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comments on "Established and Emerging Biological Therapies for the Treatment of Comorbid Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" [Letter].Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- The dawn of the dual-target era in respiratory disease: promise, pitfalls, and a roadmap for bispecific antibodies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Beyond inhaled medications: precision medicine and biologic therapies targeting the IL-33/TSLP/type 2 axis in COPD.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two different and distinct airway disorders. However, some patients exhibit features of both, a condition often referred to as asthma-COPD overlap (ACO). Managing ACO is difficult because it is characterized by different inflammatory types and significant structural airway changes. Additionally, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials focusing specifically on ACO. Biologic therapies, originally developed for severe asthma and now increasingly studied in COPD, provide a precision-medicine approach by targeting cytokines and epithelial alarmins that contribute to type 2 (T2) and/or non-T2 inflammation. Current biologics, including anti-IgE, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-4Rα/IL-13, and anti-TSLP agents, are effective in the treatment of T2-high asthma and biomarker-driven COPD. This supports their use in ACO, especially for treating patients with eosinophilic or T2-dominant types. New therapies targeting IL-33/ST2, IL-17/IL-23, and dual blocking of epithelial alarmins show promise for influencing mixed inflammation profiles, though clinical evidence in ACO is limited. Selective IL-13 inhibitors exemplify pathway-specific treatment, but they are mainly suitable for T2-high subgroups. Despite promising mechanisms, evidence for biologics in ACO is mainly based on studies of asthma and COPD, and no drug is currently approved for this group. Future research should include ACO-specific clinical trials with adequate statistical power and endotype-guided patient selection. These trials should evaluate individual biologics, possibly using new endpoints such as airway remodeling, as well as mucus biomarkers, and omics-based phenotyping. These efforts will help develop personalized, mechanism-focused treatment plans that move beyond trial-and-error management and improve the role of biologics in ACO treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.