ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Resting energy expenditure of women with and without polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Context: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is common in reproductive-age women, who often have higher BMI classification. This is assumed to stem from lower resting energy expenditure (REE), influencing lifestyle intervention guidelines. However, evidence for reduced REE in women with PCOS compared with those without is inconsistent. Objective: To systematically search and meta-analyse the existing literature to estimate and describe the difference in REE between women with and without PCOS. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Medline and Web of Science databases of published research from January 1990 to January 2025. Study Selection: Studies that measured REE in women living with PCOS, both with and without control arms of women without PCOS, were included. Data Extraction: Bibliometric, demographic, and REE data was extracted by one investigator and checked in triplicate. Data Synthesis: Thirteen studies were included in a Bayesian arm-based multiple condition comparison (i.e., network) type meta-analysis model with informative priors to compare both mean REE, and between person variation in REE, between women with and without PCOS. Mean REE differed between groups by 30 kcal/day [95% quantile interval: -47 to 113 kcal/day] and the contrast ratio for between person standard deviations was 0.98 [95% quantile interval: 0.71 to 1.33]. Conclusions: These findings indicate that REE does not meaningfully differ between women with and without PCOS. Group-level differences in resting energy expenditure are small, insignificant, or not physiologically relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.