SynthesisFrontiers in public health2025
Influencing factors of family resilience in stroke patients and family caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incidence and related risk factors of post-stroke fatigue in patients with hemorrhagic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Family Resilience and Family Adaptation in Caregivers of Disabled Older Adults: A Latent Profile Analysis.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate and explore the current status and the factors influencing family resilience in stroke patients and family caregivers through meta-analysis. Methods: This meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [CRD42024588737]. We conducted keyword search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, American Psychological Association (APA), CNKI, SinoMed, CINAHL, Wan Fang Database, and VIP Database up to August 2025. The process of screening literature, extracting data, and assessing literature quality were executed by two researchers by carefully reading the titles, abstracts, and entire texts. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 16.0 software after extracting relevant data. Results: Seventeen papers were finally included, with a cumulative total of 4,252 people surveyed. The results indicated that family caregivers had a higher level of family resilience than stroke patients. Additionally, no statistically significant relationship was found between family resilience and any of the examined demographic factors, including the patients' gender, marital status, occupational status, disease duration, stroke history, and stroke type, as well as the family caregivers' gender, religion, residence type, chronic disease status, and the presence of co-caregivers. Patients' family function, social support, self-efficacy, and positive coping were statistically significantly related to their family resilience. Similarly, family caregivers' family function, social support, self-efficacy, positive coping, and burden were associated with their family resilience. However, negative coping by neither patients nor caregivers had a significant effect on family resilience. Conclusion: This study explored the factors influencing family resilience from the dual perspectives of stroke patients and family caregivers. The results should be applied in clinical practice to guide interventions for improving family resilience, thereby helping stroke patients and family caregivers cope with the challenges and rehabilitation process following a stroke. However, future longitudinal research is still needed to verify the dynamic changes and mechanisms of family resilience. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024588737, identifier (CRD42024588737).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.