ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Penetrating aortic ulcer following endoscopic dilatation of esophageal anastomotic stenosis: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic balloon dilation serves as the first-line treatment for anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy. While generally safe, the procedure can, in rare instances, lead to severe vascular complications. Case presentation: A 64-year-old male with a prior history of esophagectomy for cancer presented with dysphagia due to an anastomotic stricture. Shortly after undergoing endoscopic balloon dilation, he developed hoarseness. Computed tomography (CT) identified a penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) with contained rupture and an associated hematoma compressing the left recurrent laryngeal nerve, consistent with Ortner's syndrome. The patient was successfully managed with emergent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). At the three-month follow-up, the aortic stent remained, and his hoarseness had significantly improved. Conclusion: This rare case of a PAU and Ortner's syndrome following endoscopic dilation underscores the critical importance of vigilance for life-threatening vascular injuries after seemingly routine procedures. It highlights the necessity of considering such complications in the differential diagnosis of post-procedural symptoms and demonstrates the efficacy of endovascular repair as a definitive treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.