Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41409939›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Nasal Adverse Events Associated With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Medications: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Implications for the Otolaryngologist.

Tasnim Kamal, Savan Shah, Umar Ahmed, Hassan Elhassan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tasnim KamalOtolaryngology, University College Hospital, London, GBR.
Savan ShahOtolaryngology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Umar AhmedOphthalmology, East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Eastbourne, GBR.
Hassan ElhassanOtolaryngology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the incidence of nasopharyngitis and sinusitis associated with stimulant and non-stimulant attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications and to assess whether differences exist between drug classes or compared with placebo. Studies published up to 1 August 2025 of adult patients receiving licensed ADHD medications reporting nasal adverse events were included from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Pooled incidence was calculated, and forest plots were constructed for placebo-controlled studies. Subgroup analyses by follow-up duration were performed to explore temporal effects. Risk of bias was assessed, and certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 18 studies with 5,468 patients met the inclusion criteria, and an additional two articles were used in the subgroup analysis. The pooled incidence of nasopharyngitis was 11.3% (n = 1880) for stimulants and 9.1% (n = 3588) for non-stimulants. Meta-analyses of placebo-controlled studies revealed no significant difference in nasopharyngitis risk between stimulant (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.84-1.40) or non-stimulant (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.33) medications and placebo. A Bucher indirect comparison demonstrated no significant differences in nasopharyngitis incidence between drug classes (RR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.76-1.9). Sinusitis occurred in 6.6% (n = 381) and 5.5% (n = 541) of stimulant and non-stimulant users, respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested higher nasopharyngitis rates in stimulant users after 12 months, up to 17% (n = 1018), whereas non-stimulant rates remained consistent over time. Neither stimulant nor non-stimulant ADHD medications were significantly associated with an increased risk of nasopharyngitis or sinusitis compared with placebo. Nevertheless, a subtle trend toward higher incidence with prolonged stimulant use suggests a potential long-term effect. In cases where alternative causes have been excluded, otolaryngologists should remain aware of this possible association. Based on these findings, we propose practical clinical considerations and future research priorities to guide ENT clinicians in optimising the management of ADHD patients with nasal symptoms.

Indexed as

adult rhinologyattention deficit hyperactivity disorder (adhd)chronic rhinitis treatmentent pathologynasopharyngitisnonallergic rhinitisnon-stimulantotolaryngology (ent)sinusitisstimulant medications

Identifiers

PMID41409939
PMCPMC12706512

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.