ReviewCureus2025
Nasal Adverse Events Associated With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Medications: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Implications for the Otolaryngologist.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the incidence of nasopharyngitis and sinusitis associated with stimulant and non-stimulant attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medications and to assess whether differences exist between drug classes or compared with placebo. Studies published up to 1 August 2025 of adult patients receiving licensed ADHD medications reporting nasal adverse events were included from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Pooled incidence was calculated, and forest plots were constructed for placebo-controlled studies. Subgroup analyses by follow-up duration were performed to explore temporal effects. Risk of bias was assessed, and certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 18 studies with 5,468 patients met the inclusion criteria, and an additional two articles were used in the subgroup analysis. The pooled incidence of nasopharyngitis was 11.3% (n = 1880) for stimulants and 9.1% (n = 3588) for non-stimulants. Meta-analyses of placebo-controlled studies revealed no significant difference in nasopharyngitis risk between stimulant (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.84-1.40) or non-stimulant (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.62-1.33) medications and placebo. A Bucher indirect comparison demonstrated no significant differences in nasopharyngitis incidence between drug classes (RR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.76-1.9). Sinusitis occurred in 6.6% (n = 381) and 5.5% (n = 541) of stimulant and non-stimulant users, respectively. Subgroup analysis suggested higher nasopharyngitis rates in stimulant users after 12 months, up to 17% (n = 1018), whereas non-stimulant rates remained consistent over time. Neither stimulant nor non-stimulant ADHD medications were significantly associated with an increased risk of nasopharyngitis or sinusitis compared with placebo. Nevertheless, a subtle trend toward higher incidence with prolonged stimulant use suggests a potential long-term effect. In cases where alternative causes have been excluded, otolaryngologists should remain aware of this possible association. Based on these findings, we propose practical clinical considerations and future research priorities to guide ENT clinicians in optimising the management of ADHD patients with nasal symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.