ArticlePsychological medicine2025
Associations between early life adversity and the development of gray matter macrostructure and microstructure.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly life adversity (ELA) is common and cross-sectionally associated with brain gray matter structure, including cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and subcortical volumes in childhood. However, to which degree ELA influences the trajectory of gray matter macrostructural and microstructural development during childhood and adolescence remains largely unexplored.
methodsWe included 6414 participants from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study at ages 9-11, where 1923 were followed to ages 11-13. We used linear mixed-effects models to test for associations between MRI-derived longitudinal measures of gray matter macro- (cortical thickness, surface area, subcortical volume) or microstructure (T1w/T2w ratio) and trauma exposure, parental acceptance, household abuse, and being resilient or susceptible to trauma in terms of developing an internalizing disorder.
resultsAt ages 9-11, higher levels of parental acceptance, trauma exposure, and being trauma resilient were associated with lower levels of cortical thickness. In contrast, being trauma susceptible was negatively related to hippocampal volume and cortical surface area. Longitudinally, more parental acceptance at baseline was associated with more cortical thinning between ages 9-11 and 11-13, while more household abuse was associated with less change in T1w/T2w ratio over time.
conclusionsParental acceptance and trauma resilience are linked to accelerated pace of apparent cortical thinning in youth aged 9-13 years, while household abuse is associated with slower microstructural development, as reflected by smaller longitudinal changes in the T1w/T2w ratio. Threat and deprivation may be distinctly associated with gray matter developmental trajectories in late childhood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.