Observational studyBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2025
Use of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of alterations in cervical cytology: A university population-based observational study
Observational study in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Conventional cervical cytology (Pap smear) remains a primary method for cervical cancer screening in Colombia, despite limitations in diagnostic yield and heavy workload. The potential of artificial intelligence to address these challenges is yet to be evaluated in our population. Objective: To evaluate and compare the discriminative ability of four artificial intelligence-based models for the detection of abnormalities in Pap smears. Materials and methods. A total of 650 images of Pap smear cells were obtained from a university cohort in northeastern Colombia. These images were subjected to diagnostic evaluation by an expert pathologist. Four artificial intelligence models (DenseNet, InceptionV3, MobileNet, and VGG19) were trained using data from a publicly available Pap smear database with digital image analysis and deep learning. The discriminative ability of the models was determined by calculating their sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve. Materials and methods: MobileNet tuvo la mejor capacidad discriminativa [área bajo la curva (AUC) de 0,97) con una especificidad del 0,99 y sensibilidad de 0,78 para la detección de alteraciones en la citología cervicouterina. Por otro lado, InceptionV3 tuvo un mejor desempeño en el tamizaje, con sensibilidad del 0,93, especificidad de 0,82 y área bajo la curva de 0,947. Results: MobileNet showed the highest discriminative ability (AUC = 0.97), with a specificity of 0.99 and sensitivity of 0.78 for the detection of altered cells in Pap smears. On the other hand, InceptionV3 had the best performance capabilities for screening, with a sensitivity of 0.93, specificity of 0.82, and AUC of 0.947. Conclusions: The results of this study illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of different artificial intelligence models and how their application could help improve the diagnostic performance of manual reading in cervical cancer screening or even serve as a primary screening method to rule out negative cases, by achieving a diagnostic performance comparable to that of manual reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.