ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2025
From Detection to Decision: Managing Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation After Stroke.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo summarise contemporary strategies to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) after stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) with emphasis on implantable loop recorders (ILRs), evaluate who should receive anticoagulation in device detected AF/atrial high-rate episodes, and evaluate biomarkers that increase the likelihood of detecting AF. RECENT
findingsILRs substantially increase AF detection beyond 12-36 months of monitoring. General population screening with ILRs increases AF diagnosis without a definitive stroke reduction. For subclinical/device detected AF, anticoagulation may reduce stroke but comes at the expense of increased bleeding. The burden of AF, biomarkers and atrial cardiomyopathy markers show promise to stratify risk and guide extended monitoring. An individualized approach is needed to identify who benefits most from ILR and subsequent anticoagulation. Research priorities include outcome-powered trials after stroke/TIA, the role of AF burden in decision making and the role of wearables within clinical pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41410714What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.