Observational studyJCI insight2026
Diurnal rhythm in chimeric antigen receptor T cell effectiveness in an observational study of 715 patients.
Observational study in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circadian rhythm-guided cellular therapy in hematologic malignancies: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and optimization strategies.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Circadian engineering of in vivo CAR T cell therapy for precision oncology.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Investigational CRISPR-Cas9-edited T cells for metastatic colorectal cancer treatment: Clinical insights for future development.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
- Circadian rhythms in the tumor microenvironment: spatiotemporal immune regulation and chronotherapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Circadian rhythms in pediatric neurocritical care: interfaces and opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Synchronizing immunity with time: unlocking the potential of chrono-immunotherapy in cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUNDChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are a leading immunotherapy for refractory B cell malignancies; however, their effect is limited by toxicity and incomplete efficacy. Daily (circadian) rhythms in immune function may offer a lever to boost therapeutic success; however, their clinical relevance to CAR T cell therapy remains unknown.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed CAR T cell survival and complications based on infusion time at 2 geographically distinct hospitals: Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, USA (n = 384) and Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon, USA (n = 331) between January 2018 and March 2025. The primary outcome was 90-day overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), ICU admission, shock, respiratory failure, and infection. We quantified the independent relationship between infusion time and outcomes using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and time-to-event models, adjusting for patient, oncologic, and treatment characteristics.RESULTSThe therapeutic index of CAR-T cells inversely correlated with the timing of administration, with later infusions associated with lower effectiveness and more adverse outcomes. For each hour that CAR T cell treatment was delayed, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 90-day mortality increased by 24% (aOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.88, P = 0.001), severe neurotoxicity by 17% (P = 0.023), and mechanical ventilation by 27% (P = 0.026). These temporal patterns were most pronounced in patients receiving CD19-targeting CAR T cell products. In contrast, we did not find an association between infusion time and severe CRS (aOR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.27; P = 0.92).CONCLUSIONTime of day is a potent and easily modifiable factor that could optimize CAR T cell clinical performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.