Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41411053›Full record

Observational studyJCI insight2026

Diurnal rhythm in chimeric antigen receptor T cell effectiveness in an observational study of 715 patients.

Patrick G Lyons, Emily Gill, Prisha Kumar, Melissa Beasley, Brenna Park-Egan, Zulfiqar A Lokhandwala, Katie M Lebold, Brandon Hayes-Lattin, Catherine L Hough, Nathan Singh and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Patrick G LyonsDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, and.
Emily GillDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Prisha KumarDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Melissa BeasleyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Brenna Park-EganDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, and.
Zulfiqar A LokhandwalaDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, and.
Katie M LeboldDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, and.
Brandon Hayes-LattinKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Catherine L HoughDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, and.
Nathan SinghDivision of Oncology, Section of Cellular Therapy, and.
Guy HazanFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Huram MokDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Janice M HussDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Colleen A McEvoyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Jeffrey A HaspelDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.

Funding

Circadian Signatures in Chronic Lung DiseaseR01HL152968 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HASPEL, JEFFREY ADAM · 2020 to 2023
$2.5M
The circadian clock as an age sensor in asthma resolutionR01HL172823 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey Adam Haspel · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
Organ donor circadian clocks in transplantation acceptanceR01HL173976 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Eric Gelman, Jeffrey Adam Haspel · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
SPOT-IT: Sepsis Prediction in Oncology Through Implementation Science and TechnologyK08CA270383 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Patrick G Lyons · 2024 to 2026
$851k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA270383NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL152968NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL172823NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL173976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are a leading immunotherapy for refractory B cell malignancies; however, their effect is limited by toxicity and incomplete efficacy. Daily (circadian) rhythms in immune function may offer a lever to boost therapeutic success; however, their clinical relevance to CAR T cell therapy remains unknown.METHODSWe retrospectively analyzed CAR T cell survival and complications based on infusion time at 2 geographically distinct hospitals: Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, USA (n = 384) and Oregon Health & Science University in Portland, Oregon, USA (n = 331) between January 2018 and March 2025. The primary outcome was 90-day overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included event-free survival (EFS), cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), ICU admission, shock, respiratory failure, and infection. We quantified the independent relationship between infusion time and outcomes using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression and time-to-event models, adjusting for patient, oncologic, and treatment characteristics.RESULTSThe therapeutic index of CAR-T cells inversely correlated with the timing of administration, with later infusions associated with lower effectiveness and more adverse outcomes. For each hour that CAR T cell treatment was delayed, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 90-day mortality increased by 24% (aOR 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.88, P = 0.001), severe neurotoxicity by 17% (P = 0.023), and mechanical ventilation by 27% (P = 0.026). These temporal patterns were most pronounced in patients receiving CD19-targeting CAR T cell products. In contrast, we did not find an association between infusion time and severe CRS (aOR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.27; P = 0.92).CONCLUSIONTime of day is a potent and easily modifiable factor that could optimize CAR T cell clinical performance.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Chimeric AntigenT-LymphocytesAdultAgedCytokine Release SyndromeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCancer immunotherapyClinical ResearchImmunologyOncology

Identifiers

PMID41411053
PMCPMC12892897

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.