ArticleEnvironmental research2026
The association between residential natural vegetation exposure at diagnosis and colorectal cancer-specific mortality among colorectal cancer cases in Kentucky.
Article in Environmental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Living near green areas with high vegetation may contribute to an active lifestyle, stress reduction, and enhance social cohesion, and consequently may be associated with improved cancer survival. Epidemiologic studies focused on greenness exposure and cancer-specific mortality, specifically colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific mortality, are sparse. We examined the association between residential greenness at diagnosis and CRC-specific mortality. Using the Kentucky Cancer Registry database, 35,868 primary CRC cases diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2018 were followed until death or November 2020. Residential greenness exposure at diagnosis was estimated using Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) with 270m and 1230m buffers. Using Cox models, we estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of CRC-specific mortality and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) by quartiles of greenness. We assessed effect modification using the Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT). We observed 9805 CRC-specific deaths over 208,098 person-years of follow-up. While crude assessments suggested an inverse relationship between NDVI quartiles and CRC-specific mortality, the association was null after adjustment for individual- and neighborhood-level characteristics (270m Buffer aHR Quartile 4 versus Quartile 1: 1.01, 95 % CI: 0.95, 1.08, p-trend = 0.65; 1230m Buffer aHR Quartile 4 versus Quartile 1: 1.03, 95 % CI: 0.96, 1.10, p-trend = 0.26). No effect modification was observed by urban/rural status, race, or neighborhood-level income, while modification by stage was observed for the 270m buffer (LRT p-value = 0.03). Our findings suggest that residing in greener areas was not associated with CRC-specific mortality. Future studies should consider additional greenness measures, greenness interactions, and residential changes over follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.