ArticleScientific reports2025
Detection of cortical arousals in sleep using multimodal wearable sensors and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sleep awake detection from leg-worn wearables using deep sensor fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cortical arousals are brief brain activations that disrupt sleep continuity and contribute to cardiovascular, cognitive, and behavioral impairments. Although polysomnography is the gold standard for arousal detection, its cost and complexity limit use in long-term or home-based monitoring. This study presents a noninvasive, machine learning-based framework for detecting cortical arousals using the RestEaze™ system, a leg-worn wearable that records multimodal physiological signals including accelerometry, gyroscope, photoplethysmography (PPG), and temperature. Across multiple methods tested, including logistic regression, XGBoost, and Random Forest classifiers, we found that features related to movement intensity were the most effective in identifying cortical arousals, while heart rate variability had a comparatively lower impact. The framework was evaluated in 14 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) undergoing assessment for restless leg syndrome-related sleep disruption. The Random Forest model achieved the best overall performance, with a ROC-AUC of 0.94 and an AUPRC of 0.55, substantially higher than the baseline prevalence of arousals (~ 0.07). For the arousal class specifically, it reached a precision of 0.57, recall of 0.78, and F1-score of 0.65. These findings support the feasibility of wearable-based machine learning for real-world arousal detection, demonstrated here in a pediatric ADHD cohort with sleep-related behavioral concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.