Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413226›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

An Automated Classifier of Harmful Brain Activities for Clinical Usage Based on a Vision-Inspired Pre-trained Framework.

Yulin Sun, Xiaopeng Si, Runnan He, Xiao Hu, Peter Smielewski, Wenlong Wang, Xiaoguang Tong, Wei Yue, Meijun Pang, Kuo Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yulin SunMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3097-7755
Xiaopeng SiMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Runnan HeMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xiao HuNell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peter SmielewskiBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Wenlong WangMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoguang TongNeurology Department, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Wei YueNeurology Department, Tianjin Huanhu Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Meijun PangMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Kuo ZhangMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Xizi SongMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
Dong MingMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. richardming@tju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8192-2538
Xiuyun LiuMedical School, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China. xiuyun_liu@tju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9540-4865

Funding

Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2021YFF1200602Major Science and Technology Special Projects and Engineering-Major Project of National Key Laboratories 24ZXZSSS00510National Natural Science Foundation of China 82472098, 32300704National Science Fund for Excellent Overseas Scholars 0401260011Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2024-JKCS-16Scientific Research Innovation Capability Support Project for Young Faculty ZYGXQNJSKYCXNLZCXM-H15Tianjin Natural Science Foundation-Outstanding Youth Project 24JCJQJC00250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timely identification of harmful brain activities via electroencephalography (EEG) is critical for brain disease diagnosis and treatment, which remains limited in application due to inter-rater variability, resource constraints, and poor generalizability of existing artificial intelligence models. In this study, we describe an automated classifier, VIPEEGNet, which leverages the advantage of transfer learning from ImageNet-pretrained models to distinguish six types of brain activities. For the development cohort, the recall of VIPEEGNet ranges from 36.8% to 88.2%, and the precision ranges from 55.6% to 80.4%, with performance comparable to that of human experts. Notably, the external testing showed Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) values of 0.223 (public) and 0.273 (private), ranking second among the existing 2767 competing algorithms, while using only 0.7% of the parameters of the top-ranked algorithm. Its minimal parameter requirements and modular design offer a deployable solution for real-time brain monitoring, potentially expanding access to expert-level EEG interpretation in resource-limited settings.

Identifiers

PMID41413226
PMCPMC12715239

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.