ArticleBrain topography2025
Exploring Brain Network Dynamics in Suicide Attempt Survivors Using EEG Microstate Analysis.
Article in Brain topography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accumulating evidence has revealed deviations in neural network connectivity among individuals with suicidal ideation (SI). We sought to explore the neural network dynamics of suicide attempt (SA) survivors. We recruited 31 SA survivors, 33 individuals with SI, and 33 normal people controls (NP). To investigate brain network dynamics, we collected 64-channel resting-state EEG recordings and conducted microstate analysis on all participants. Compared to the NP group, both SA survivors and SI group displayed greater coverage and occurrence of microstates A and B. Notably, relative to the SI group, a marked elevation in the occurrence of microstates D and E and a significant increased coverage of microstate E, were observed in the SA group. The SA group exhibited significantly shorter durations of microstates C, D, and E, along with reduced occurrence and coverage of microstate C, compared to the SI group. The SA group exhibited significantly greater transition probabilities from microstate E to any other microstate compared to the SI group. Furthermore, higher suicide risk scores significantly correlated increased occurrence of microstate D, occurrence of microstate E, and coverage of microstate E. A key limitation is the cross-sectional design, which restricts the capacity to establish whether microstate dynamics can serve as predictors of future suicidal behavior. The present results imply that the microstate dynamics of SA survivors are distinct from those of individuals with SI. These results indicate that microstate dynamics could potentially act as neurobiomarkers for distinguishing suicidal behavior and SI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.