Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2026
Prognostic Impact of Infarct Size and Coronary Microvascular Function Via Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Coronary Angiography-Derived Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.
Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06502899 (Prognostic Value of CMR-related Parameters in Patients with MINOCA), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prognostic Value of CMR-related Parameters in Patients with MINOCA
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Impact of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Microvascular Dysfunction in MINOCA: Still a Moving Target.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfarct size (IS) and microvascular obstruction (MVO), measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are key prognostic markers after myocardial infarction (MI). The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) predicts MVO and IS; however, its role in MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is unclear. This study explored the relationship between coronary angiography-derived IMR, MVO, and IS in true MINOCA and assessed the prognostic value of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), IS, and MVO.
methodsPatients with suspected MINOCA who completed cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary angiography-derived IMR were included. CMD was defined as coronary angiography-derived IMR >25, and IS as a percentage of left ventricular mass (IS%LV) measured by late gadolinium enhancement. True MINOCA was identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance evidence of ischemia or infarction. Individuals with true MINOCA were divided into 3 groups: non-CMD and IS%LV <16.78%, CMD or IS%LV ≥16.78%, and CMD with IS%LV ≥16.78%. Follow-up for major adverse cardiovascular events was conducted.
resultsOf 317 patients, 102 had true MINOCA (91.2% non-ST-segment-elevation MI). CMD was similarly distributed across all suspected MINOCA. Coronary angiography-derived IMR did not predict MVO or IS among true MINOCA. Over a median 27 months, 33.3% of patients with true MINOCA experienced major adverse cardiovascular events, with a higher risk in patients with CMD or IS%LV ≥16.78%. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that CMD combined with IS%LV ≥16.78% had a hazard ratio (HR) of 7.40 (95% CI, 1.94-28.23), and either CMD or IS%LV ≥16.78% had an HR of 8.77 (95% CI, 2.57-29.94), but MVO did not. Sensitivity analyses excluding ST-segment-elevation MI supported these findings.
conclusionsCMD with larger IS strongly predicts major adverse cardiovascular events in MINOCA, underscoring their utility in risk stratification, especially for non-ST-segment-elevation MI. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT06502899.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.