ArticleScientific reports2025
A Museum artifact classification model based on cross-modal attention fusion and generative data augmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cultural heritage preservation has garnered global attention. Museum artifact classification, a core task, faces challenges related to insufficient multimodal information collaboration and a scarcity of high-quality annotated data. Traditional methods and single-modality deep learning models struggle to achieve both efficiency and accuracy. To address this, this paper proposes a museum artifact classification model (VBG Model) based on cross-modal attention fusion and generative data augmentation. This model constructs an integrated multimodal framework through task-oriented refactoring of the Vision Transformer (ViT), BERT, and a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN). ViT extracts global visual features from artifact images, while BERT mines the historical and cultural semantics of text. A bidirectional interactive attention fusion layer achieves precise feature alignment. The GAN generates diverse samples, forming a closed "generation-feedback-optimization" loop to alleviate data scarcity. Experiments on the MET and MS COCO datasets demonstrate exceptional performance: the VBG Model achieves 92% classification accuracy, 0.85 mAP, and 88% F1 score for the former, while the latter achieves 90% accuracy, 0.83 mAP, and 86% F1 score for the latter. These performance indicators outperform competing models such as ResNet and DenseNet. Ablation experiments confirm that cross-modal fusion and generative data augmentation modules are essential; removing either module results in a 5%-9% drop in accuracy. The current model still has room for improvement in terms of training time and generated image quality. Future work will focus on optimizing performance through lightweight design and multi-scale fusion, enhancing the ability to distinguish similar artifacts and providing technical support for digital artifact management and cultural heritage preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.