ArticleScientific reports2025
HydroPredictor a hybrid machine learning model for addressing data scarcity in groundwater prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Groundwater prediction in data-scarce and environmentally sensitive regions presents a persistent challenge due to limited observational data, spatial heterogeneity, and the nonlinear nature of hydrogeological processes. In this study, we propose HydroPredictor, a hybrid machine learning framework that integrates the categorical handling efficiency of CatBoost with the nonlinear feature learning capacity of a regularized Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). The model was trained on a geo- referenced dataset of 315 samples from the Feija Basin in southeastern Morocco, incorporating ten environmental predictors such as elevation, rainfall, soil permeability, NDVI, and topographic wetness index. The pipeline includes Optuna-based hyperparameter optimization and 5-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness and generalization. HydroPredictor achieved a testing accuracy of 89.23%, with an F1-score of 0.8937 and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.90 across all groundwater potential classes. Statistical validation using the Friedman and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (p < 0.05) confirmed its significant outperformance over conventional models, including Random Forest, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and standalone MLP. Furthermore, HydroPredictor demonstrated superior generalization compared to prior models in the literature (e.g., RF-SSA: AUC = 0.840; GBDT: AUC = 0.88), while maintaining minimal overfitting (∆Accuracy = 0.35%). By combining interpretable tree-based embeddings with deep neural representations, HydroPredictor provides a robust and scalable solution for groundwater classification in data-limited settings, offering a reproducible and operationally relevant tool for sustainable groundwater resource management under climatic and environmental uncertainty.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.