ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Measuring the care risk in older adults with dementia: a scoping review.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults with dementia face heightened care risk, defined as the uncertainty surrounding adverse events arising from the complex interplay of factors related to the individual, caregivers, the physical/social environment, and care processes during daily, rehabilitative, or recreational activities. It poses significant threats to their well-being, that of their families, and society at large. However, the approach to assessing care risk in older adults with dementia remains unclear. We aimed to identify current risk assessment tools and perspectives for older adults with dementia by providing a comprehensive overview and highlighting significant gaps in the current research. MAIN TEXT: This study adhered to the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping review alongside the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Eight databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI, WANFAGN, and WIP, were searched from their inception to 30th December 2023. We identified 13,106 articles, 16 of which met the inclusion criteria. The research approaches adopted in the reviewed articles were qualitative analysis (N = 4, 25%), quantitative analysis (N = 7, 43.75%), and mixed methods (N = 5, 31.25%). Five tools for measuring care risk were identified. Among them, the most common domains in older adults with dementia are the living environment, characteristics of older adults, caregivers, and social support.
conclusionsFour primary care risk dimensions were identified: physical health, caregivers, social support, and environment, which inform risk assessment and training. Notably, existing tools require longitudinal studies to validate stability, and future research should prioritize patient-centered assessment perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.