ArticleBMC public health2025
Latent obstacles in older adults' digital health participation: a community-based hybrid cluster analysis with natural language processing.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives of French community-dwelling older adults on the use of digital services: a qualitative study based on interviews.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe intensification of global aging has made older adults’ health issues increasingly prominent. Although digital health tools play a crucial role in aging societies, older adults still face multi-dimensional potential obstacles that restrict their effective participation. Natural Language Processing (NLP) can efficiently analyze the data of older adults’ feedback in digital health to uncover hidden patterns. Therefore, this study constructs a community-based hybrid NLP analysis method to reveal the deep obstacle mechanisms affecting the digital health participation of the elderly.
methodsIn this study, interview data from 35 older adults were collected through semi-structured focus group interviews in five community health activities. After pre-processing the data, a document-term matrix was constructed using Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) vectorization. By integrating the three methods of Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling, BERTopic topic modeling, and SBERT with K-means clustering analysis, the semantic features and topic distribution within the text data are systematically analyzed. Among them, BERTopic (K = 4) has become the most effective clustering model in this study with high word-level consistency (0.5328), reasonable topic diversity (0.5583), and good document-level consistency (0.8467).
resultsThe research findings indicate that the potential obstacles affecting older adults’ digital health participation are primarily the functional and design manifestations of deeper, socio-psychological, and social environmental latent barriers. These are clustered into four aspects: psychological barriers to digital technology use, clarity and usability of health information, a mismatch between technology provision and user needs, and user interface (UI) design and accessibility challenges. Older adults’ relatively low digital literacy leads to fear and anxiety toward technology. In obtaining effective information, they face the issue of information overload and have doubts about the authenticity and reliability of the information. The lack of positive technology learning experiences and external support makes older adults prone to a sense of low self-efficacy. The uneven distribution of community resources and the limited technical support capabilities of family members further exacerbate the obstacles to older adults’ digital health participation.
conclusionThis study proposes a new method for in-depth exploration of the potential obstacles to older adults’ digital health participation from a semantic level by combining multiple clustering analysis methods. It provides valuable references and technical guidance for subsequent related research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.