Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413670›Full record

ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies

Holistic and Analytic Attention in Infancy: A Cross-Cultural Study in Sweden and Zimbabwe.

Hsing-Fen Tu, Linda van den Berg, Kim Astor, Samson Mhizha, Gustaf Gredebäck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Some culture is hiding in plain sight in research on child development.The British journal of developmental psychology · 2026
    Review
  2. Holistic and Analytic Attention in Infancy: A Cross-Cultural Study in Sweden and Zimbabwe.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hsing-Fen TuDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Linda van den BergDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kim AstorDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Samson MhizhaFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Gustaf GredebäckDepartment of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3046-0043

Funding

Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation KAW 2012.0120Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation KAW 2017.0284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pre-registered eye-tracking study assesses whether there are differences in infants' attention allocation across diverse cultural contexts while taking several social-environmental factors into account. More specifically, we assess whether 9-month-old infants (n = 338; 166 girls, 172 boys) show holistic or analytic viewing when they are presented with naturalistic images, including 32 real-world images (8 outdoor and 8 indoor scenes from two cultural contexts). Infants came from families living in Uppsala, Sweden (Swedish n = 178, Arab n = 1, Bengali n = 1, Finnish n = 1) and Harare, Zimbabwe (Shona n = 136, Karanga n = 4, Malawian n = 1, Ndebele n = 1, Chewa n = 1, Hwesa n = 1, Zambian n = 1). Results demonstrate that attention allocation is different in these cultures in infancy, but that each culture has a unique pervasive, and dynamic attentional style that includes a mix of holistic and analytic components.

Indexed as

AttentionCross-Cultural ComparisonFixation, OcularInfant BehaviorEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansInfantMalePhotic StimulationSocial EnvironmentSwedenZimbabweattentioncultureeye trackingindividual differencesinfant

Identifiers

PMID41413670
PMCPMC12715074

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.