Evidence mapPaperPMID 41413736Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2025

Sex and Gender Aspects in New-Onset Heart Failure Prognosis: A Review of Recent Advances.

Lourdes Vicent, Rafael Salguero-Bodes, Fernando Arribas-Ynsaurriaga, Roberto Martín-Asenjo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lourdes VicentDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain. mlourdesvicent@gmail.com.
Rafael Salguero-BodesDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Arribas-YnsaurriagaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto Martín-AsenjoDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), CIBERCV, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review examines sex-based differences in prognosis and management of new-onset heart failure (HF), focusing on biological, clinical, and sociocultural determinants. RECENT

findingsRecent cohort studies and registries show that women with new-onset HF are older, more often present with HFpEF, and have lower early mortality but higher rehospitalization and worse quality of life. Men frequently present with HFrEF and ischemic etiology, experiencing higher short-term mortality. Emerging biomarkers, including galectin-3 and GDF-15, display sex-specific prognostic value. Persistent underrepresentation of women in clinical trials and disparities in access to guideline-directed therapy remain critical gaps. Sex and gender substantially influence new-onset HF presentation and outcomes. Tailored diagnostic thresholds, sex-informed therapeutic strategies, and equitable research designs are essential to improve care. Future studies should integrate intersectional perspectives and precision medicine approaches to address disparities and optimize prognosis for all patients.

Indexed as

Heart FailureQuality of LifeBiomarkersFemaleHumansMalePrognosisSex FactorsBiomarkersBiomarkersGender disparitiesHealth equityNew-onset heart failurePrognosisSex differences

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.