Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41413746›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of obesity (2005)2026

Large language models in obesity: a systematic review.

Thanathip Suenghataiphorn, Narisara Tribuddharat, Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Narathorn Kulthamrongsri

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of obesity (2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thanathip SuenghataiphornDepartment of Internal Medicine, Griffin Hospital, Derby, CT, USA. Thanathip.sue@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7811-7960
Narisara TribuddharatSt. Elizabeth Medical, Boston, MA, USA.
Pojsakorn DanpanichkulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.
Narathorn KulthamrongsriUniversity of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveGenerative artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), is rapidly evolving and holds significant potential for addressing the multifaceted challenges of obesity management. This systematic review synthesizes current research on LLM applications within the obesity field, critically evaluating their performance, limitations, and key future research directions.

designElectronic databases, including MEDLINE, OVID, and SCOPUS, were systematically searched from inception to August 2025 to identify eligible studies. Eligible studies investigated the potential role of LLMs in obesity medical and surgical care. Key findings were extracted and synthesized narratively. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias across each study.

resultsThirty-three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis reveals that LLMs are being applied across a diverse range of obesity-related topics, including personalized nutrition, educational interventions, guideline-directed medical therapy, weight loss strategies, anti-obesity medication information, and motivational interviewing. While some LLMs demonstrated promising accuracy and utility, substantial variability was observed. Numerous studies highlighted limitations, including inconsistent recommendations, inaccuracies, difficulties in handling complex scenarios, and a potential for biased outputs.

conclusionsGenerative AI and LLMs show considerable promise for enhancing various aspects of obesity management, from personalized interventions to clinical decision support. However, the current state of the technology exhibits crucial limitations regarding accuracy, consistency, and the ability to handle nuanced clinical situations, mandating a continued critical role for clinician oversight and validation. Further research is imperative to address these shortcomings, focusing on improving model training, validating performance in real-world settings, and addressing ethical considerations before widespread clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLanguageObesityHumansLarge Language Models

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.