ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2025
On the Completeness of Existing RNA Fragment Structures.
Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Zero-shot benchmarking of RNA language models in structural, functional, and evolutionary learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- rsRNASP1: A distance- and dihedral-dependent statistical potential for RNA 3D structure evaluation.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of protein structure prediction by the deep learning method AlphaFold 2 naturally raises the question of whether similar success can be achieved for RNA structure prediction. One reason for the success in protein structure prediction is that the structural space of proteins, from the fragment level to the domain level, has been nearly complete for many years. Here, we examined the completeness of RNA fragment structural space at the di-, tri-, tetra-, and penta-nucleotide levels. We show that the number of non-redundant structural fragments at the tetra- and penta-nucleotide levels is in the midst of exponential increase, suggesting that the structural space currently observed in RNA is far from complete. Thus, more concerted efforts are clearly needed to improve the speed and methods of experimental determination of RNA structures to go beyond the limited structural space observed in RNAs. Moreover, the reference frame composed of three sugar-ring atoms near the base side (O4', C1', and C2') exhibits the least structural diversity among existing RNA structures, suggesting it as the most stable platform for building other parts of RNA structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.