Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415029›Full record

SynthesisNIHR open research2025

The effects of sunlight exposure on mortality: a systematic review of epidemiological studies.

Thomas Parkhouse, Francesca Spiga, Lesley E Rhodes, Sarah Dawson, Katie E Webster, Deborah M Caldwell, Julian P T Higgins

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NIHR open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas ParkhouseNIHR Bristol Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 2PS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-5376
Francesca SpigaNIHR Bristol Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 2PS, UK.
Lesley E RhodesDivision of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, England, M13 9PL, UK.
Sarah DawsonNIHR Bristol Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 2PS, UK.
Katie E WebsterNIHR Bristol Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 2PS, UK.
Deborah M CaldwellNIHR Bristol Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 2PS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8014-7480
Julian P T HigginsNIHR Bristol Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, England, BS8 2PS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Current sun safety advice focuses on minimizing exposure to sunlight, due to the relationship between ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. However, sunlight also has beneficial effects, and there are calls for guidance to reflect these alongside the harmful effects. To examine the net effect of harmful and beneficial aspects, we aimed to determine the association between sunlight exposure and all-cause mortality. Additionally, we examined cause-specific mortality and whether the associations varied according to skin type/colour or ethnicity. Methods: We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Nov 2023) for reports of epidemiological studies in the general population investigating the effect of long-term sun exposure on all-cause, cardiovascular-related, or cancer-related mortality. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the findings and assessed risk of bias using the ROBINS-E tool. PROSPERO: CRD42023474157. Results: The search identified 73 eligible articles, with 55 included in the narrative synthesis. Methods of measuring sunlight exposure comprised radiation, proxy measures of radiation (e.g., latitude) and behaviour associated with sunlight exposure. The evidence was mixed. While most studies of skin cancer mortality found a higher risk associated with more exposure to sunlight, many studies of other cancers reported lower associated risk. Evidence for all-cause mortality was mixed, as were findings for cardiovascular mortality. Results were subject to high risk of bias, largely due to the likelihood of uncontrolled confounding and the use of indirect measures of sunlight exposure. There were insufficient data regarding any differential effects of sunlight on mortality for those of different skin types/colours or ethnicity. Conclusion: Findings from observational epidemiological studies of the association between sunlight exposure and mortality vary across different disease outcome and location being investigated. As such, the findings do not provide a strong rationale for changes to sun protection guidance.

Indexed as

Systematic review; Sunlight; Ultraviolet radiation; Mortality; Cancer; Cardiovascular disease

Identifiers

PMID41415029
PMCPMC12709114

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.