ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-driven mitochondrial gene signature for the diagnosis of breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A highly interpretable machine learning model for predicting lung cancer bone metastasis: uncovering the synergistic effect of routine biochemical markers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Navigating the Metabolic-Genomic Paradigm: Mitochondrial Reprogramming as a Driver of Cancer Plasticity.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial biology and immune crosstalk in breast cancer: therapeutic opportunities and challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) ranks among the most prevalent malignant tumors in women globally, with mitochondrial dysfunction constituting one of its pathogenic mechanisms. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between mitochondrial function-related genes and BC progression. Methods: We identified BC differentially expressed genes via the GEO database, constructed a weighted co-expression network to determine BC pathogenesis-related key modules. Using 113 machine learning algorithms and MitoCarta mitochondrial genetics data, we developed a mitochondrial gene-based diagnostic model. GO/KEGG enrichment analyses delineated BC-related biological processes of mitochondrial genes, offering clues for understanding BC mechanism. High-throughput tissue chip and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) validated key genes' local expression in tissues. CiberSort immune infiltration analysis highlighted NK and T cells' role in BC; single-cell analysis identified gene expression patterns across tumor microenvironment cell types. Computational drug prediction and molecular docking explored targeted therapeutic candidates. Additionally, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations. Results: The glmBoost+LDA model had the highest C-index (0.947) in the validated cohort, including 18 potential BC biomarkers (e.g., ACADS, AUC = 0.810; AIFM2, AUC = 0.806). The results of experimental validation showed that the expression score of ACADS in cancerous tissues was significantly lower than that in adjacent non-cancerous tissues. Immune infiltration and single-cell analyses emphasized the crucial roles of NK cells and T cells in BC. Disulfiram and eugenol were predicted as potential therapeutics and validated by docking. Molecular dynamics simulations validated that Eugenol exhibits strong binding interactions with the target proteins AIFM2 and ACADS. Conclusions: This study identifies mitochondrial gene signatures associated with BC and proposes a computational model distinguishing tumor from normal tissue. These findings offer potential leads for future biomarker development but require additional clinical and functional validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.