Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41415434›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Query-driven generative AI synthesizes multi-modal spatial omics from histology.

Minxing Pang, Tarun Kanti Roy, Xiaodong Wu, Kai Tan

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minxing PangApplied Mathematics & Computational Science Graduate Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tarun Kanti RoyDepartment of Computer Science, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Xiaodong WuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Kai TanDepartment of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9104-5567

Funding

Data Analysis UnitU2CCA233285 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HUNGER, STEPHEN PATRICK, TAN, KAI · 2018 to 2023
$13.2M
Organ Specific Project - HeartU54HL165442 · NHLBI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MOFFITT, JEFFREY, PEI, LIMING · 2022 to 2025
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA233285NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL165442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial omics technologies offer unprecedented insights into the cellular organization of tissues; however, they are not yet scalable for routine clinical use. In contrast, images of histological staining remain the foundation of pathological diagnosis despite lacking molecular information. Bridging this gap requires computational methods that can accurately infer spatial molecular data from histology alone. Here, we introduce TissueCraftAI, a generative artificial intelligence framework that predicts multi-modal spatial omics maps directly from standard histology images using natural language prompts. To train and validate our model, we created PRISM-12M, a large-scale dataset comprising over twelve million spatially registered histology and spatial omics image patches across fourteen tissue types from humans and mice. TissueCraftAI significantly outperforms existing methods in generating realistic histology images and predicting spatial proteomics and transcriptomics data with high fidelity. We demonstrated its utility in various downstream applications, including improving cell type annotation and enhancing the accuracy of patient survival predictions across multiple cancer types. By enabling flexible, query-driven

Identifiers

PMID41415434
PMCPMC12710965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.