Evidence mapPaperPMID 41416132Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Discomfort and Clinical Documentation in Postoperative Care of Central Venous Catheters After Surgery: A Prospective Descriptive Study.

Maria Lithner, Adina Noghi, Thomas Kander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria LithnerDepartment of Health Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2562-9948
Adina NoghiDepartment of Surgery Skane University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0436-7769
Thomas KanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5404-2981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: Central venous catheters are vital in the peri- and postoperative period for patients undergoing abdominal surgery but are associated with risks such as catheter related infections. Signs of infection, like tenderness and induration at the insertion site, are important to recognize, as they may precede catheter-related infections, but are often neglected. The aim was to compare surgical patients' experience of central venous catheter with the nursing documentation. Methods: Data was collected from short patient interviews and by reviewing electronic health record documentation. Results: In total, 106 patients were included, 103 of whom had a central venous catheter located in the internal jugular vein. The median (interquartile range) number of days with a catheter was 10 (8-16). There were no catheter related infections, but potential risks were identified. In 56% of the patients, central venous catheters were removed within the last 2 days before discharge. The most common reason for keeping the catheter was blood sampling. The results from the interviews indicate that 37 of the patients experienced considerable discomfort, such as persistent sensations of constriction, restricted mobility and pain, however, these symptoms were documented in the electronic health record for only three patients. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the necessity of systematically addressing patients' symptoms and individual needs in the postoperative care of the central venous catheter. Incorporating these aspects as a mandatory element in the standardized documentation template within the electronic health record will constitute an important first step toward enhancing patient-centred care. There is a need for clearly defined guidelines outlining the indications for retention or removal of central venous catheters to minimize catheter-days during postoperative care in surgical wards. Trial Registration: As this was a descriptive, qualitative observational study that did not involve testing a new intervention, compare interventions, or randomize participants, we did not find trial registration necessary under commonly accepted guidelines for clinical trial registration.

Indexed as

central venous catheterCLABSIdevice removaldocumentationinfection controlpostoperative carevascular access device

Identifiers

PMID41416132
PMCPMC12710081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.