Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41416136›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in antibiotics2025

Antimicrobial and antibiofilm effects of crude and microencapsulated guava leaf extracts against

Daniela Gutierrez-Montiel, Alma L Guerrero-Barrera, Adriana C Moreno-Flores, Flor Y Ramírez-Castillo, Norma A Chávez-Vela, Guillermo Cristian Guadalupe Martínez-Ávila, Roberto Rico-Martínez, Matheus de O Costa, Fabiola Galindo-Guerrero, Francisco J Avelar-Gonzalez and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in antibiotics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Rambutan (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniela Gutierrez-MontielLaboratorio de Biología Celular y Tisular, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Alma L Guerrero-BarreraLaboratorio de Biología Celular y Tisular, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Adriana C Moreno-FloresLaboratorio de Biología Celular y Tisular, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Flor Y Ramírez-CastilloLaboratorio de Biología Celular y Tisular, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Norma A Chávez-VelaLaboratorio de Biotecnología, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento Ingeniería Bioquímica, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Guillermo Cristian Guadalupe Martínez-ÁvilaLaboratorio de Química y Bioquímica, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, General Escobedo, Mexico.
Roberto Rico-MartínezLaboratorio de Toxicología Acuática, Departamentos de Química y Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Matheus de O CostaLarge Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Fabiola Galindo-GuerreroLaboratorio de Biología Celular y Tisular, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Francisco J Avelar-GonzalezLaboratorio de Estudios Ambientales, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Fisiología y Farmacología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Ingrid G Ornelas-GarciaLaboratorio de Biología Celular y Tisular, Centro de Ciencias Básicas, Departamento de Morfología, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.
Omar Franco-RamírezDepartment of Data Science, Escuela de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Universidad de Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methods: This study assessed the antimicrobial activity of crude and microencapsulated extracts of Results: Guava leaf extract reduced the growth of all three bacterial strains evaluated. For Conclusion: microencapsulation allowed a reduction in the extract concentration and guava leaf extract shows potential as an antimicrobial agent for future application.

Indexed as

antiadhesion effectsantibiofilmantimicrobialguava leafplant extractsPsidium guajava L.

Identifiers

PMID41416136
PMCPMC12708567

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.