ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Sarcopenia is a bad harbinger of cancer-related survival in rectal cancer.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to letter regarding: "sarcopenia is a bad harbinger of cancer-related survival in rectal cancer".Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Regarding: "sarcopenia is a bad harbinger of cancer-related survival in rectal cancer".Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Pragmatic Screening for Sarcopenia in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Development and Internal Validation of a Prospective Risk Model Integrating T12 CT Indices and Routine Clinical Variables.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesSarcopenia, characterized by the progressive loss of skeletal muscle mass and function, has been linked to poor oncological outcomes. This study aimed to assess the relationship between sarcopenia-defined through combined radiological and biochemical assessments-and survival outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.
methodsSarcopenia was evaluated using radiological measurements of skeletal muscle mass, visceral and subcutaneous fat tissue volumes, and biochemical parameters including albumin, protein, and Fib-4 index levels.
resultsDeceased patients were older than survivors (mean 70 vs. 63years). Elevated Fib-4 scores (3.0-4.9) were mainly observed in non-operated patients with poor tumor regression. Post-treatment albumin levels were significantly higher in patients with complete response (42.0±3.5mg/dL) than in those with regression score-3 (37.3±8.7mg/dL) and non-operated patients (34.9±8.3mg/dL;
conclusionsSarcopenia is associated with decreased overall survival in rectal cancer. In patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, lower volumes of muscle mass, subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat, together with lower albumin and protein levels and higher Fib-4 scores, may serve as predictive markers of sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.