ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2026
Identifying Key Predictors of Smoking Cessation Success: Text-Based Feature Selection Using a Large Language Model.
Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe most effective way to reduce mortality and morbidity among current smokers is to quit smoking. Although about half of smokers attempted to quit, only one-tenth succeeded in 2022. Understanding key predictors of smoking cessation success would inform smoking cessation interventions and increase quitting rates.
methodsWe analyzed data from waves 5 and 6 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (December 2018 to November 2021). Using OpenAI's GPT-4.1, we identified the top 45 variables from wave 5 that are highly predictive of 12-month smoking abstinence in wave 6, based on descriptions of survey variables. We then validated the predictive power of the GPT-4.1-selected variables by comparing the performance of eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) trained on different sets of variables. Finally, we derived insights into the top 10 variables, ranked according to their SHapley Additive exPlanations values.
resultsThe performance of XGBoost trained with all possible wave 5 variables and the 45 selected variables was almost identical (AUC:0.749 vs AUC:0.752). The top 10 variables included past 30-day smoking frequency, minutes from waking up to smoking first cigarette, important people's views on tobacco use, prevalence of tobacco use among close associates, daily electronic nicotine product use, emotional dependence, and health harm concerns.
conclusionsThe high predictive performance of XGBoost, when trained on the selected variables, underscores the efficiency and efficacy of GPT-4.1-based feature selection. The top 10 variables include various risk factors that have been previously reported in the literature for their influence on smoking behavior. IMPLICATIONS: Our findings do not establish causal relationships between the selected predictors and 12-month smoking abstinence. However, identifying these key predictors provides valuable insights into the factors highly associated with smoking cessation success. This study demonstrates the ability of OpenAI's GPT-4.1 to perform feature selection using only the textual descriptions of variables. The efficient and successful application of GPT-4.1 for variable selection highlights the potential of integrating artificial intelligence tools into tobacco research to guide resource-efficient and targeted intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.