ArticleReproduction & fertility2026
Development of a risk model for low oocyte retrieval in first-cycle IVF patients with diminished ovarian reserve: a retrospective single-center study.
Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Low oocyte retrieval (LOR), defined as oocytes retrieved from <50% of mature follicles, significantly impacts IVF success, especially in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). Predictive models tailored for this population are limited. This retrospective cohort study developed a predictive nomogram for LOR risk in first-cycle IVF/ICSI patients with DOR. The data from 2,594 eligible patients were analyzed. LOR was defined as oocyte retrieval rate <50% (oocytes/follicles ≥14 mm on trigger day). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression identified predictors from clinical/endocrine parameters. A multivariate logistic model was built, visualized as a nomogram, and internally validated (bootstrap resampling). Performance was assessed via AUC, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Eight independent predictors were identified: age, basal FSH, AFC, AMH, LH on hCG day, progesterone (P) on hCG day, number of large follicles (≥14 mm) on hCG day, and trigger-to-retrieval time (TR-OPU). The model demonstrated moderate yet acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.721, 95% CI: 0.678-0.772) and calibration. TR-OPU was significantly shorter in the LOR group (34.85 vs 35.05 h, P < 0.001). DCA confirmed clinical utility. This study establishes a clinical-endocrine nomogram predicting LOR risk in first-cycle DOR patients. Incorporating key factors, such as TR-OPU, ovarian reserve markers (AMH, AFC, and bFSH), and trigger-day hormones, it may help stratify risk but requires external validation before clinical application. Lay summary: Women with naturally lower egg reserves often face extra challenges with IVF. A common problem is retrieving fewer eggs than expected during the procedure ('low oocyte retrieval' or LOR), which significantly lowers the chance of pregnancy. Doctors lack good tools to predict who is most at risk. Our study analyzed data from 2,594 women with low egg reserves undergoing their first IVF cycle. We created a simple prediction chart that combines key information easily available to doctors: the woman's age, standard hormone blood tests (AMH and FSH), an ultrasound count of egg sacs (follicles), hormone levels on the day of the final IVF trigger shot, and critically - the exact number of hours between the trigger and the egg collection surgery. This chart accurately estimates an individual woman's risk of LOR. Knowing this risk beforehand helps doctors personalize treatment timing and medication, aiming to collect more eggs and improve the chances of a successful pregnancy, while helping patients avoid unnecessary emotional and financial strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.