ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Interpretable machine learning model integrating CT radiomics, CTR, and clinical features for EGFR mutation prediction in ≤3 cm lung adenocarcinoma nodules.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-invasive prediction of EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is critical for treatment planning, particularly in small pulmonary nodules where tissue genotyping is limited. However, the consolidation-to-tumor ratio (CTR), a clinically relevant imaging biomarker, has rarely been incorporated into radiomics-based models.
objectiveTo develop and validate an interpretable CT radiomics model incorporating CTR and clinical features for predicting EGFR mutation status in LUAD patients with nodules ≤3 cm.
methodsIn this retrospective study included 492 patients with pathologically confirmed LUAD who underwent preoperative non-contrast chest CT between January 2017 and December 2022. Tumors were manually segmented for radiomic feature extraction, and CTR was measured for each lesion. Radiomic textures were computed with PyRadiomics using a fixed gray-level bin width. Feature selection was performed using analysis of variance and mutual information filtering followed by RFE with a random-forest base estimator. Three random forest classifiers were constructed: a radiomics-only model, a clinical-only model, and a combined radiomics-clinical model. Model performance was assessed by AUC with 95% CI, and interpretability was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP).
resultsThe combined model achieved the best performance (AUC, 0.74 [95% CI: 0.69-0.79] in training; 0.76 [95% CI: 0.66-0.85] in testing), outperforming the radiomics-only (AUC, 0.69) and clinical-only (AUC, 0.60) models in the testing cohort. CTR was the most influential feature according to SHAP analysis.
conclusionA interpretable radiomics model integrating CTR and clinical features enables effective non-invasive prediction of EGFR mutation status in small LUAD nodules, supporting molecular risk stratification when tissue genotyping is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.