ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning-based risk prediction model for cognitive dysfunction in elderly individuals.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical statistics education in the big data era: focusing on critical thinking and ethical competence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the advancement of globalization, the prevalence of cognitive dysfunction in the elderly population has risen significantly. Early intervention may dramatically alleviate the disease burden and reduce economic costs associated with cognitive impairment. This study aims to construct a risk prediction model for cognitive dysfunction based on machine learning (ML) algorithms, providing healthcare professionals and patients with a more accurate and effective tool for risk assessment.
methodsThis study included 1,325 elderly participants who completed cognitive assessments and comprehensive laboratory blood tests. Risk factors for cognitive dysfunction were identified through univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression, LASSO regression, and the Boruta algorithm. Nine ML methods-Random Forest (RF), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Decision Tree, and Elastic Net-were employed to construct the prediction models. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) algorithm was utilized to interpret the final model.
resultsThe Random Forest model exhibited the highest predictive performance, with an AUC value exceeding those of other models. SHAP analysis identified age, race, education level, diabetes, and depression as the primary predictors of cognitive dysfunction in the elderly. The calibration curve indicated a strong alignment between the model's predictions and actual outcomes, while the decision curve confirmed the model's clinical applicability.
conclusionAge, race, education level, diabetes, and depression are significant influencing factors of cognitive dysfunction in the elderly. Among the ML algorithms evaluated, the Random Forest model exhibited the best predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.