Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419090›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Neuromodulator timing regulates adult cortical plasticity via the synaptic eligibility trace.

Brendan M Williams, Michael S Borland, Tanya T Danaphongse, Lasya Pasapula, Jayant K Rajagopal, Seth A Hays, Crystal T Engineer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brendan M WilliamsDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States; Texas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States. Electronic address: Brendan.Williams@utdallas.edu.
Michael S BorlandTexas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Tanya T DanaphongseTexas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Lasya PasapulaDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Jayant K RajagopalDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Seth A HaysTexas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States; Department of Bioengineering, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Crystal T EngineerDepartment of Neuroscience, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States; Texas Biomedical Device Center, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.

Funding

Enhancing Speech Processing In A Rat Model Of Autism Using Vagus Nerve StimulationR01DC017480 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI ENGINEER, CRYSTAL T · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLearning-induced cortical reorganization is facilitated by neuromodulator release. However, the precise temporal relationship between neuromodulator release and neural activity required to induce plasticity is not well understood. In single synapses, eligibility traces regulate plasticity such that neuromodulator arrival must occur within seconds of activity. Cortical plasticity can also be induced by pairing neuromodulator release with neural activity, but it is unknown whether plasticity in populations of neurons is regulated by the same temporal constraints.

methodsTo determine whether the synaptic eligibility trace regulates cortical plasticity, we used vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) to drive neuromodulator release 3 s before, 1 s before, concurrent with, or 3 s after tone-evoked activity in auditory cortex. After 20 days of pairing, we used in vivo electrophysiology to quantify the proportion of auditory cortex responding to the paired tone frequency.

resultsWe found that VNS 1 s before or concurrent with tone onset significantly expanded the representation of the paired tone frequency (-1s, p = 0.04; 0s, p = 0.02), whereas 3 s before or after did not (-3s, p = 0.87; +3s, p = 0.53). Confirming the role of neuromodulators in this eligibility trace, we found that depletion of norepinephrine prevented VNS-tone pairing-induced plasticity (0s + DSP4, p = 0.23). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates that cortical plasticity is regulated by time constraints similar to the synaptic eligibility trace and highlights the importance of considering the timing of neuromodulator release when employing methods to enhance plasticity.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexNeuronal PlasticityNeurotransmitter AgentsSynapsesAcoustic StimulationAnimalsMaleTime FactorsVagus Nerve StimulationNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID41419090
PMCPMC13282730

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.