Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419170›Full record

ArticleVirus research2026

A weakly supervised framework for automated biological assay assessment.

Hongru Jiang, Qianyu Guo, Xiao Zhi, Heng Li, Yao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongru JiangSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Qianyu GuoShanghai Institute of Virology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200225, China. Electronic address: qyguo@sjtu.edu.cn.
Xiao ZhiShanghai Institute of Virology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200225, China.
Heng LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yao ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China. Electronic address: yao.chen@sjtu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quantification of biological assays, such as plaque and microbial assays is essential in virology and microbiology research. However, low-contrast images of stain-free samples are difficult to segment accurately and manual labeling is time-consuming. To address these problems, we present a weakly supervised framework for automated biological assay assessment. First, we collected and constructed weakly supervised datasets for viral plaque and microbial colony segmentation using point and bounding box annotations respectively. Then, we proposed an adaptive region-growing algorithm that generates mask annotations, reducing annotation burden. We adapted and fine-tuned automatic Segment Anything Model (SAM) to for biological specimen segmentation, demonstrating improved accuracy across diverse assay types. Moreover, we also validated our method on live cell segmentation. Finally, we applied our model in antiviral compound assessment and achieved comparable results to manual assessment. In summary, our framework provides an efficient and automated solution for biological assay quantification, reducing annotation burden while maintaining accuracy.

Indexed as

Automation, LaboratoryBiological AssayImage Processing, Computer-AssistedViral Plaque AssayAlgorithmsAntiviral AgentsHumansVirusesAntiviral AgentsBiological assaysImage segmentationMicrobial assayPlaque assayWeakly supervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41419170
PMCPMC12794578

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.