Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41419508›Full record

ReviewScientific reports2025

Trustworthy deep learning for malaria diagnosis using explainable artificial intelligence.

Rahila Parveen, Baozhi Qui, Wei Song, Nouf Al-Kahtani, Mona M Jamjoom, Samih M Mostafa, Nadia Sultan, Joddat Fatima

Abstract readComparative StudyReviewValidation Study
In one paragraph

Review in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rahila ParveenSchool of Computer and Artificial intelligence, Zhengzhou University, 100, Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China.
Baozhi QuiSchool of Computer and Artificial intelligence, Zhengzhou University, 100, Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China. iebzqiu@zzu.edu.cn.
Wei SongSchool of Computer and Artificial intelligence, Zhengzhou University, 100, Science Avenue, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China.
Nouf Al-KahtaniDepartment of Health Information Management and Technology College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia.
Mona M JamjoomDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Samih M MostafaComputer Science Department, Faculty of Computers and Information, Qena University, Qena, 83523, Egypt. samih_montser@sci.svu.edu.eg.
Nadia SultanCenter of Excellence in AI (CoE-AI), Department of Electrical Engineering, Bahria University Faculty of Engineering Sciences, H-11, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Joddat FatimaCenter of Excellence in AI (CoE-AI), Department of Software Engineering, Bahria University Faculty of Engineering Sciences, H-11, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2025R104), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. PNURSP2025R104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria remains a major global health concern, particularly in regions with limited healthcare infrastructure. Traditional diagnostic methods such as microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) suffer from scalability, sensitivity, and expertise-related limitations, underscoring the need for automated diagnostic strategies. This study investigates deep learning models for malaria detection from blood smear images. Four convolutional neural networks (CNNs), MobileNetV2, VGG19, InceptionV3, and ResNet18, were empirically evaluated, with ResNet18 achieving the highest F1-score of 96.33%. Building on these results, two advanced hybrid architectures, Xception and Inception-ResNetV2, were fine-tuned on a dataset of 27,090 images from the Kaggle malaria collection, attaining classification accuracies of approximately 98% on validation and test sets. Model robustness was further confirmed using an independent dataset from the Harvard Dataverse containing thick smear images captured under varied staining and imaging conditions, where accuracy remained consistently high (97-98%). To enhance interpretability and clinical trust, three explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), were employed. These complementary methods provide spatial, superpixel, and pixel-level transparency into the models' decision-making. Furthermore, representative misdiagnosed samples are presented, wherein these visualization techniques reveal morphological and staining artifacts that led to erroneous predictions, clarifying model failure modes and improving transparency. The proposed AI-based diagnostic framework thus demonstrates high accuracy, interpretability, and generalization, representing a scalable solution for malaria detection in resource-limited healthcare settings.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMalariaAnimalsFemaleHumansMicroscopyBlood smear analysisDeep learningExplainable AIGrad-CAMInception-ResNetV2LIMEMalaria detectionMedical image classificationXception

Identifiers

PMID41419508
PMCPMC12748609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.