ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
RMS: a ML-based system for ICU respiratory monitoring and resource planning.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (RF) occurs frequently in critically ill patients and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and resource use. We developed a comprehensive machine-learning-based monitoring system to support ICU physicians in managing RF through early detection, continuous monitoring, assessment of extubation readiness, and prediction of extubation failure (EF). In study patients, the model predicted 80% of RF events with 45% precision, identifying 65% of events more than 10 hours before, significantly outperforming standard clinical monitoring based on oxygenation index. The model was successfully validated in an external ICU cohort. We also demonstrated how predicted EF risk could help prevent extubation failure and unnecessarily prolonged ventilation. Lastly, we illustrated how prediction of RF risk, along with ventilator need and extubation readiness, helped ICU resource planning for mechanical ventilation. Our model predicted ICU-level ventilator demand 8-16 hours ahead, with a mean absolute error of 0.4 ventilators per 10 patients.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.