ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
The effects of stroboscopic vision training on physical performance in athletes: a systematic review.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating stroboscopic visual perturbation into a neuromuscular warm-up in adolescent male basketball players: effects on cognitive function, physical performance, and postural stability-a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Sensor-Based and VR-Assisted Visual Training Enhances Visuomotor Reaction Metrics in Youth Handball Players.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of stroboscopic vision training on visuomotor reaction and soccer-specific reactive agility in male collegiate soccer players: a randomized controlled intervention study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Stroboscopic visual training and the brain: a narrative review of neural mechanisms underlying perceptual-cognitive adaptation in interceptive sports.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Essential visual skills for cricket performance and talent development: a review of the literature.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Review
- The effects of stroboscopic visual training on coordination, change-of-direction, and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStroboscopic visual training (SVT), a relatively new modality, temporarily limits visual input to enhance visuomotor processing and motor coordination. It has gained attention in sports science and rehabilitation, but evidence on its effects remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to systematically synthesize the existing literature to evaluate the effects of SVT on athletes' physical performance.
methodsThe study's search and analysis were done according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature was systematically reviewed across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to July 27, 2025 using keywords related to stroboscopic visual training and its effects on various aspects of physical performance. Of the 32 full-text articles evaluated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 met the eligibility requirements. Only articles published in English were included.
resultsA total of 14 studies involving 542 athletes were included and analyzed. Most studies reported that stroboscopic visual training produced significantly larger improvements in hand-eye coordination (2 studies), reaction time (6 studies), agility (1 study), and reactive agility (3 studies) compared with training under normal visual conditions. Additionally, enhancements were observed in balance, jump performance, and visuomotor performance. Sport-specific performance metrics demonstrated moderate yet consistent improvements.
conclusionStroboscopic visual training may serve as an effective adjunct to conventional training, potentially leading to improvements in physical performance parameters such as reaction time, hand-eye coordination, agility, and visuomotor performance. However, given the lack of quantitative analysis in the current review, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality research is needed to confirm the current results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.