ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
"It is because we women do not have a voice to be heard" - perceptions of gender-based discrimination and its relevance to health: a qualitative study with women in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender-based discrimination (GBD) remains a pervasive determinant of health inequity for women globally, yet its systemic and culturally embedded forms in low- and middle-income countries are underexplored. This study explores women’s lived experiences of GBD in Burkina Faso, Ghana and Tanzania, highlighting how intersecting social and institutional norms influence access to health care, education, employment, financial resources and the resulting impacts on women’s health.
methodsBetween February and May 2022, 17 focus group discussions and 32 in-depth interviews were conducted with 167 women across twelve regions in the three countries. Thematic analysis was employed to identify core patterns in how women perceive and navigate GBD in their daily lives.
resultsAcross all sites, participants conceptualized GBD as a normalized, systemic structure embedded in both public and private spheres. Women described GBD as omnipresent and internalized, upheld by cultural, religious, economic and educational norms that reinforced power imbalances, particularly in household decision-making. These structural constraints limited women’s access to education, employment, healthcare, and financial autonomy, and positioned them as both subjects of and gatekeepers to gendered hierarchies. GBD was identified as a key barrier to maternal care such as reproductive autonomy, with male dominance over contraceptive use, and pregnancy-related decisions. This lack of autonomy, compounded by institutional biases and sociocultural stigma, was perceived to contribute to delayed care, emotional distress, and adverse physical and mental health outcomes.
conclusionThe findings underscore the need for multisectoral strategies to address women’s health inequities. Efforts must focus on dismantling entrenched gender norms, enhancing women’s decision-making power, and ensuring institutional accountability for gender equity within health systems – not only in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Tanzania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.