Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420073›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Deep Learning-Based Denoising for High-Resolution Carotid Vessel Wall MRI Using Standard Neurovascular Coils.

Lisha Zeng, Yin-Chen Hsu, Lixia Wang, Meng Lu, Mary Keushkerian, Kim-Lien Nguyen, Kevin J Johnson, Maria I Altbach, H Douglas Morris, J Kevin DeMarco and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Lisha ZengBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7758-5156
Yin-Chen HsuBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4483-486X
Lixia WangBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2304-7536
Meng LuBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mary KeushkerianDepartment of Cardiology, Radiology, and Bioengineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1811-5607
Kim-Lien NguyenDepartment of Cardiology, Radiology, and Bioengineering, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-2976
Kevin J JohnsonDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Maria I AltbachDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
H Douglas MorrisWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
J Kevin DeMarcoWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Vibhas DeshpandeSiemens Medical Solutions, Austin, Texas, USA.
Dimitrios MitsourasDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
David SalonerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Scott McNallyDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Seong-Eun KimDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
John A RobertsDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1786-0969
J Rock HadleyDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Dennis L ParkerDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Gerald S TreimanVA Salt Lake City, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Debiao LiBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8560-8231
Yibin XieBiomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0333-567X

Funding

Multi-Center Implementation and Validation of Efficient Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Analysis of Atherosclerotic Disease of the Cervical CarotidR01HL159200 · NHLBI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ALTBACH, MARIA I., DESHPANDE, VIBHAS · 2021 to 2025
$6.1M
A Receptor-Targeted Nanoparticle PET Tracer in Human Carotid AtherosclerosisR01HL159803 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Pamela K Woodard, Mohamed A. Zayed · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
CSRD VA I01 CX001901CSRD VA I01 CX002208NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159200NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL159200NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL159803VA MERIT I01CX001901VA MERIT I01CX002208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a deep learning (DL) denoising method to enhance high-resolution carotid vessel wall MRI quality acquired using a standard head-and-neck clinical coil.

methodsFifty-five scans were performed as part of an ongoing multicenter study. Routine carotid VWI protocol including 2D T1- and T2-weighted TSE, 3D TOF-MRA, and MPRAGE was performed using simultaneous acquisition from a standard 20-channel head-and-neck coil and a high-sensitivity Neck-Shape-Specific (NSS) surface coil. Paired retrospective reconstructions with and without NSS coil elements served as the reference and input, respectively. A supervised DL model employing a residual UNet architecture was optimized and trained to map low-SNR inputs to high-SNR references, benchmarked against conventional denoising algorithms using quantitative and qualitative metrics.

resultsThe DL denoiser substantially reduced noise while preserving vessel-wall structures across contrast-weighted sequences. It achieved PSNR > 31 dB and structural similarity index (SSIM) > 0.93 versus reference slices. In segmented vessel-wall and lumen regions of interest (ROIs), the DL approach achieved significantly higher SNR and CNR values than input images (p < 0.05), closely approaching the reference. Furthermore, inner-wall edge sharpness was maintained (Average ERD 7.50-8.51 mm with DL vs. 7.15-8.28 mm with references), supporting confident downstream plaques assessment. Radiologists' Likert ratings corroborated these image-quality improvements.

conclusionA DL-based method was developed to improve high-resolution, multi-contrast carotid vessel wall MRI acquired using low-SNR standard head-and-neck coils. The resulting image quality was comparable to that obtained with specialized neck surface coils, potentially enabling broader access to advanced carotid imaging without the need for additional hardware.

Indexed as

Carotid ArteriesDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSignal-To-Noise Ratiocarotid surface coildeep learningdenoisingmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)vessel wall imaging (VWI)

Identifiers

PMID41420073
PMCPMC13034719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.