ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Denoising for High-Resolution Carotid Vessel Wall MRI Using Standard Neurovascular Coils.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop a deep learning (DL) denoising method to enhance high-resolution carotid vessel wall MRI quality acquired using a standard head-and-neck clinical coil.
methodsFifty-five scans were performed as part of an ongoing multicenter study. Routine carotid VWI protocol including 2D T1- and T2-weighted TSE, 3D TOF-MRA, and MPRAGE was performed using simultaneous acquisition from a standard 20-channel head-and-neck coil and a high-sensitivity Neck-Shape-Specific (NSS) surface coil. Paired retrospective reconstructions with and without NSS coil elements served as the reference and input, respectively. A supervised DL model employing a residual UNet architecture was optimized and trained to map low-SNR inputs to high-SNR references, benchmarked against conventional denoising algorithms using quantitative and qualitative metrics.
resultsThe DL denoiser substantially reduced noise while preserving vessel-wall structures across contrast-weighted sequences. It achieved PSNR > 31 dB and structural similarity index (SSIM) > 0.93 versus reference slices. In segmented vessel-wall and lumen regions of interest (ROIs), the DL approach achieved significantly higher SNR and CNR values than input images (p < 0.05), closely approaching the reference. Furthermore, inner-wall edge sharpness was maintained (Average ERD 7.50-8.51 mm with DL vs. 7.15-8.28 mm with references), supporting confident downstream plaques assessment. Radiologists' Likert ratings corroborated these image-quality improvements.
conclusionA DL-based method was developed to improve high-resolution, multi-contrast carotid vessel wall MRI acquired using low-SNR standard head-and-neck coils. The resulting image quality was comparable to that obtained with specialized neck surface coils, potentially enabling broader access to advanced carotid imaging without the need for additional hardware.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.