ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Social robots in cognitive and speech rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy: a scoping review.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren with cerebral palsy (CP) often experience cognitive, speech, and communication challenges that limit participation and daily functioning. Socially assistive robots (SARs) have emerged as a promising technology to support these domains, yet evidence remains fragmented across different settings, robot types, and intervention approaches. This scoping review aimed to map current research on SAR-based cognitive, speech, and communication rehabilitation for children with CP and to identify trends, gaps, and opportunities for future work.
methodsThe review followed the PRISMA-ScR framework. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, and EBSCOhost) were searched for articles published between 2015 and 2025. Eligible studies involved children aged ≤ 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of CP and used a social robot with interactive or socially oriented features as part of cognitive, speech, communication, or engagement-focused rehabilitation. Screening and data charting were performed by four reviewers. Extracted data included participant characteristics, robot type, intervention setting, rehabilitation domain, outcome measures, and key findings. Results were synthesized descriptively and thematically.
resultsTwenty studies met inclusion criteria. SAR interventions were delivered in clinical, educational, or home environments and commonly targeted speech production, vocabulary, symbolic play, attention, and social engagement. Across studies, SARs improved motivation, communication attempts, engagement duration, and participation. Humanoid and animaloid robots were both effective as adjunctive tools, with high acceptance among children, parents, and therapists. However, evidence is limited by small sample sizes, short intervention durations, heterogeneous outcome measures, and limited inclusion of children with severe motor or communication impairments. Few studies evaluated long-term effects or standardized rehabilitation protocols.
conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that SARs are feasible and engaging tools that can enhance cognitive, speech, and communication rehabilitation for children with CP. To advance clinical integration, future research should include longer and larger trials, standardized outcome measures, personalization strategies, and assessments across functional classifications. Strengthening methodological rigor will be essential for translating SARs from prototypes into validated rehabilitation technologies. Trial registration Not applicable; this scoping review did not involve human participants in an intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.