Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420273›Full record

ArticleLiver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver2026

Expandable Constrained Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: An Individualised Approach for High-Risk Patients?

Hannah Rieland, Timo C Meine, Anja Tiede, Jim B Mauz, Heiner Wedemeyer, Jan B Hinrichs, Frank K Wacker, Benjamin Maasoumy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Expandable Constrained Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: An Individualised Approach for High-Risk Patients?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah RielandDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4906-3948
Timo C MeineInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Anja TiedeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5936-8307
Jim B MauzDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Heiner WedemeyerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2906-0480
Jan B HinrichsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0135-7082
Frank K WackerInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Benjamin MaasoumyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Infectious Diseases and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsA transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can effectively overcome portal hypertension, but is prevented by contraindications in a considerable proportion of patients. In this study, we investigated the option of a constrained TIPS (cTIPS) with reduced diameter for high-risk patients.

methodsElective cTIPS were placed in 60 high-risk patients at Hannover Medical School (10/2020-04/2023). In the cTIPS procedure, a 6 mm stent(-graft) was inserted first into the intrahepatic tract to constrain the TIPS endoprosthesis. Procedural data, complications and 12 months follow-up were recorded. A control cohort of patients with standard TIPS (sTIPS) was generated using propensity score matching, resulting in 40 patients per group.

resultsIndications for cTIPS were cardiac impairment, poor liver function and/or history of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in 22, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. cTIPS was technically successful in all patients. Portosystemic gradient (PSG) was successfully lowered in both groups (sTIPS: median 60% reduction and cTIPS: median 50% reduction from an initial PSG of 15 mmHg in both groups, p = 0.006), while post-TIPS PSG remained higher in the cTIPS group compared to the sTIPS group (cTIPS: median 7 mmHg vs. sTIPS: median 6 mmHg; p = 0.042). TIPS dysfunction and revision were significantly more frequent in the cTIPS cohort than in the sTIPS cohort (sTIPS: 1 vs. cTIPS: 9; p = 0.014 and sTIPS: 7 vs. cTIPS: 13; p = 0.036). Control of portal hypertensive symptoms (no paracentesis, no bleeding) was similar in both groups (p = 0.267), but overt HE was less frequent in the cTIPS group than in the sTIPS group (sTIPS: 14 vs. cTIPS: 4; p = 0.042).

conclusionThe constrained TIPS may offer a more careful step-up approach for selected high-risk TIPS patients. The technical procedure appears to be safe and feasible, however the risk for thrombosis and therefore needed revisions is increased. Larger study cohorts are needed to further explore promising results.

Indexed as

Hypertension, PortalPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticAdultAgedFemaleHepatic EncephalopathyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment Outcomecardiac decompensationcontraindicationhepatic encephalopathyportal hypertensionTIPStransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Identifiers

PMID41420273
PMCPMC12717333

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.