Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41420421›Full record

Trial reportCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2025

Effects of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex on Motor Performance in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Study.

Penny Ping Qin, Ivan Kin-Yeung Chak, Rebecca Lai-Di Kan, Min-Xia Jin, Bella Bing-Bing Zhang, Adam Wei-Li Xia, Tim Tian-Ze Lin, Sharie Xiao Wang, Jian-Hui Liu, Teris Cheung and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06312930 (Neuromodulation of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation on Primary Motor Cortex in Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06312930 nacompletednot on this map

Neuromodulation of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation on Primary Motor Cortex in Adults: A Randomized, Cross-over, Single-blind, Sham-controlled, Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsHealthy AdultsArmsTranscranial pulse stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Penny Ping QinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9517-1579
Ivan Kin-Yeung ChakDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Rebecca Lai-Di KanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Min-Xia JinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Bella Bing-Bing ZhangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Adam Wei-Li XiaDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Tim Tian-Ze LinDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Sharie Xiao WangDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jian-Hui LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Teris CheungSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Georg S KranzDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3892-1804

Funding

Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0040786Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0042417Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0043155Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0055985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsWe aimed to investigate the behavioral aftereffects of a novel noninvasive brain stimulation technique-transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS)-applied over the right motor cortex (rM1) in healthy adults.

methodsThirty-four healthy adults underwent a randomized, subject- and analyst- blind, crossover trial, receiving active TPS over the rM1 or control TPS over the vertex in two sessions 24 h apart. Motor performance was assessed using the Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT) and the Simple Reaction Time Task (SRTT) before, immediately after, and every 10 min for 40 min after each session. A linear mixed model and post hoc analyses were applied to evaluate the effects.

resultsNo significant interaction effect (stimulation condition × time) was found. The left-hand NHPT performance significantly improved from 10 min post-TPS onward in both conditions (ps ≤ 0.002).

conclusionA single session of rM1-TPS does not yield significant improvements in motor dexterity compared to vertex-TPS. Future well-powered studies with a sham control condition and multiple stimulation sessions are needed to investigate the aftereffects using a combination of neurophysiological and neuroimaging approaches.

trial registrationThis study was registered in ClinicalTrial.gov in April 2024 (NCT06312930).

Indexed as

Motor CortexPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultCross-Over StudiesEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReaction TimeYoung Adultmotor cortexmotor functionnoninvasive brain stimulationtranscranial pulse stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41420421
PMCPMC12717462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.