ReviewDiscover oncology2025
CDK4/6 inhibitor rechallenge therapy in advanced breast cancer.
Review in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hormone receptor (HR)-positive is the most common subtype in female breast cancer (BC) patients, and endocrine therapy (ET) is the primary treatment for HR-positive BC. Clinical studies have confirmed that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors combined with ET can significantly prolong the progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced BC patients. Consequently, the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and ET has been established as a first-line treatment for advanced HR-positive BC or a standard treatment following ET progression. However, the regimen after CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment failure remains highly controversial, and the reported clinical outcomes of CDK4/6 inhibitor rechallenge are inconsistent. Preclinical studies have collected evidence suggesting that multiple mechanisms may contribute to intrinsic or acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Future research should further investigate the translational relationship between resistance mechanisms and clinical efficacy, and identify biomarkers to screen the benefit population from CDK4/6 inhibitor rechallenge therapy, developping individualized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.